Privacy

31798 readers

274 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Some questions for the AirVPN users (on linux) (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 8 months ago by ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm running out of mullvad in 23hr, and I'm excited to have port forwarding back! Hit a small snag though: I have the acct and have Eddie running on my phone as I type this, however when it comes to my Fedora install I'm paralyzed by choice.

Should I install:

Eddie GUI,
Eddie CLI,
both those,
or "Suite - based on our own AirVPN OpenVPN 3 library?"

I'm pretty comfortable with CLI especially if there's docs (actually prefer it typically), so that isn't really my concern. I'd like wireguard though which I'm not sure if "suite" yet supports, and port forwarding is the most important (slsk) so that would sway my decision as well (if it's only working on Eddie gui or something, for instance.)

My other main concern is I want the ability to auto connect to the VPN during the bootstrap, which "Suite" says it can do with bluetit, but idk if eddie CLI or GUI can do it. Would it be worth it to ditch wireguard until Suite supports it in favor of the bootstrap connection?

Any info at all that y'all have on these clients would be much appreciated, thank you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Download a wireguard client file and run it as a systemd service. It'll come up on boot and you won't ever have to think about it. The only reason to bother with the GUI is if you want to have graphical control of what server you connect to. Their wireguard config generator on their website gives you the ability to set a geographic area for your wireguard client file, so it's not like you have to select only one server if you go that route either.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

I'd recommend plain Wireguard as well. Pretty much every distro has Wireguard in their official repositories so you can be sure it works well with however networking is set up with that distro.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Alright I'll probably go this route, is there a recommended wireguard client for fedora you're aware of by chance? Dnf search shows a wireguard-tools.x86_64 unless another I can get an .rpm for elsewhere is better.

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, I've not used a redhat based distro in at least 20 years, so you're going to have to get that info from someone else. I'd assume that's the one though, and I doubt you need to go looking for something better. It is what it is.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Well thanks for the info! I'll prob try this route.

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I just added the config in GNOME's settings on my PC and in the Wireguard app on my phone