this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
1328 points (100.0% liked)

196

16416 readers
2126 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
1328
Tr(rule)am (midwest.social)
submitted 9 months ago by mossy_capivara@midwest.social to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Would sky trains be as reliable? I assume subways are more reliable partially due to not being exposed to the elements.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

At the end of the day, they're still just trains, and while Vancouver's trains DO seem to be somewhat bafflingly effected by severe weather, for the most part things keep running like normal as it still is only somewhat

[–] coffee_whatever@lemmy.tf 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My guess would be that they are separated from any traffic, just like a subway and unlike trams or buses which are a part of it. No other traffic = less delays and accidents = more reliable transport

[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

and unlike trams or buses which are a part of it

Are you sure?