this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
604 points (100.0% liked)

196

16503 readers
2509 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Better get the subscription and let them brick your printer if you stop paying

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] midget247@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Oh he wasn't good (less terrible) for signing the Magna Carta, which wasn't even that important at the time, but more because his competition is worse. And yeah, no one named after him, but that's only relative to other monarchs - as in, he was bad to the royals. Failing at being a king can make you a good king, depending on how you're judging it. Nobles thought he was a prick, but they were, so it's like 6 of one. For example, he reformed the legal system which took power away from barons (which obviously favoured him), which was very popular with lower classes, as they could since seek justice against their barons (who were previously the ones overseeing those cases).

My opening line was mainly a joke, I don't like any monarchs, but the idea he was particularly bad is... contentious