this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
289 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4032 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Their idea was to tie approval of military assistance to Ukraine to tough border security demands that Democrats would never accept, allowing Republicans to block the money for Kyiv that many of them oppose while simultaneously enabling them to pound Democrats for refusing to halt a surge of migrants at the border. It was to be a win-win headed into November’s elections.

But Democrats tripped them up by offering substantial — almost unheard-of — concessions on immigration policy without insisting on much in return. Now it is Republicans who are rapidly abandoning a compromise that gave them much of what they wanted, leaving aid to Ukraine in deep jeopardy, border policy in turmoil and Congress again flailing as multiple crises at home and abroad go without attention because of a legislative stalemate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Oh look, another article from the NY times accepting the lie that manageable and needed immigration is somehow a crisis surge. I really wish democrats hadn't decided that xenophobia is bipartisan now.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s called diplomacy and it is a requirement of getting anything done in a split Congress.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social -4 points 9 months ago

The NY times isn't in congress though.

Diplomacy is usually between different nations. When political parties negotiate it's more commonly called horse-trading, or compromise. But again that's not the job of a national newspaper.

It's also quite possible to compromise with someone without parroting their lies.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Immigration isn't always a xenophobia issue. See also, Canada right now. The US situation isn't currently comparable but there has been a surge so it's not surprising that people would be investigating that.

[–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Here in Boston we've got migrants sleeping in the airport, the state transportation building, and now the state owned gym and pool complex across the street from my house. The governor is draining a $600 million rainy day fund plus asking for another $250 million to help manage the inflow of migrants. Meanwhile our housing crisis is only getting worse, and we've literally got no place to send these desperate people. I'm pretty far left, but this doesn't feel manageable to me.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They're going to get help from the federal government as soon as Democrats have the House. They'll probably reduce funding for the border that goes to Texas to pay for it.

Republicans are fucking your state to help their election chances. Stop them by voting in Democratic House members to get your money back from Texas and Florida.

[–] yacht_boy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Uh, you do realize I'm from Massachusetts, right? Our elections are decided in the democratic primary when we pick which candidates will breeze through the general election and take their house seats. The last time we sent a republican to DC was in 1994.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago

Hey the better Griffin does in the primary the more of a message may be able to get across to Warren who is wanting term three.