this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
819 points (87.5% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35492 readers
997 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I bought 175 g pack of salami which had 162 g of salami as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 146 points 9 months ago (8 children)

wouldnt weight slightly fluctuate with moisture content?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 138 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

yeah. 8g is a tiny weight difference here and could easily be accounted-for due to humidity with pasta. it's about the weight of 3-4 strands of that pasta

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Could also just be losing a strand or two in packaging. It happens. That's why they're allowed some wiggle room on the packaging weight, and 8 grams is a pretty reasonable margin of error for a product like this.

Shrinkflation is definitely a thing, but this isn't a good example.

[–] 9715698@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The same package in Germany is 500g, so maybe there is an element of shrinkflation as well.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's also why the target is 410 was of 400 I'd imagine .

[–] Head@lemmings.world 8 points 9 months ago

Idk about that. When I worked in a factory we always measured 510 g into our 500 g packages in order to avoid this happening. You're getting ripped off and making excuses for it.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So they package it wet? If the weight went down it means the pasta was wetter at time of boxing.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

not wet, but probably not nearly as dry, per se. also, fluctuations in temperature (specifically, mass of air in the packaging), as well as calibration issues on the devices- if you use two devices to measure... you'll always get slightly off measurements.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s far more likely that this is just weight variation which is allowable per the Food Safety and Inspection Service

However, I would sooner blame the scale itself as it doesn’t look like a scientific scale. So it’s likely not calibrated and will drift over time. Plenty of things could explain an 8g difference as measured by the average joe.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If it weren't obscenely expensive to do so, it would make sense for all scales to be calibrated to a NIST traceable standard, with periodic recalibrations at preset intervals.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Most kitchen scales could be easily calibrated with a measuring cup and water if they really wanted to do this. Just have a few included cups for 25,50,100ml of water and then fill them on the scale and tell it what the volume is.

That will easily get you within a gram of error for most common food weights.

[–] PlantObserver@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If I'm reading table 2-9 right this package would be allowed to be under by 28.3g

Yeah that seems to be how it reads.

Weird that heavier packages are allowed a smaller tolerance ? Like a 198g package can be 28g under, but in the last row anything over 4.5kg needs to vary by less than 1%

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

yeah, but that doesnt mean much. the hoover damn is still drying.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The Hoover Dam concrete would cure in 125 years by conventional or natural methods. Crews, however, used some innovative engineering methods to hasten the process.

Nearly 600 miles of steel pipes woven through the concrete blocks significantly reduced the chemical heat from the setting for the concrete. Crews relied on 1,000-pound blocks of ice produced daily at the site’s ammonia-refrigeration plant.

Would have doesn't mean is. Source

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact, concrete actually never stops curing, so I don’t know why they claim they could speed it up. Concrete has to set, dry and cure. You can speed up the first two, but not the last. You can make it reach design spec in say 7 days instead of 28, but it never stops curing.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Opinion: If it never stops curing, then maybe we should stop using that term.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What other term would we use? Lost of items never fully “cure” I’m struggling to think of something that does. Paint doesn’t, nail polish doesn’t.

It’s why it has to dry and set first. Concrete is completely usable after it’s set, it just gets stronger as it cures.

Why do you think paint says not to wash the wall for a month after, the paint still has to cure after drying and setting.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm saying, come up with another term.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or you just didn’t know what the term meant and assumed and now for some odd reason want multiple industries to change what they’ve used for decades….?

Sure they’ll get right on that, or you could read a dictionary, there’s that option too.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or we could stop pedantic arguments like this by having a separate name for the two similar but different chemical reactions.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

…. Cure and set, I literally just explained that to you…. Yet you still want cure changed?

And for what it’s worth, I gave a fun fact, and you started being the “pedantic” one after that since you misunderstood, so go look in a mirror? lmfao.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And you were the one to get your feathers ruffled by my opinion that you could have just left alone.

So pedant, shall we continue?

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

…. Your opinion was

If it never stops curing, then maybe we should stop using that term.

So I explained that’s why we use “set” and now apparently I’m pedantic for pointing out we have those terms and have zero need to do that. That ruffled your feathers.

Imma just block you.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

And my opinion wasn't about set and cure.

It was about materials that have a point where they finish curing and the ones that continue to cure. Because as YOU state there are materials in both categories.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

So is all the water it's holding back 😱

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

RH during packing 55%, RH in OPs house 25%

Just different conditions, even ~~his~~ their (sorry) neighbors house could have a different RH and different results.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Also, could it be the weight with the box?

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

When you see “Net weight” or a symbol that looks like a big minuscule “e”, it means that the package weight doesn’t count.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

I don't see anything like that in OP's picture.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

8 grams? I doubt very much a cardboard box only weighs 8 grams.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You’re correct

https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/3765768f-82f8-42eb-9d8e-6c2127c2b550.jpeg

[–] Baines@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

can I see a pic out the box with it above weight stated?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I had to explain to my kids the other day how you don’t ever wish death on anyone. I was just going to ask if OP lives somewhere dry, because that would explain why they’re seeing this with so many foods.

People might be wondering wtf there’s no moisture in dry pasta. But there is: it will absorb moisture content from the surrounding atmosphere.

I had to learn about this effect because of woodworking. Wood absorbs enough moisture to appreciably change in size over the seasons, to the point where your whole table can crack in half if it’s built the wrong way.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If you want to get technical, aren't grams a measure of mass, not weight, so a kitchen scale needs to assume a value for gravity's acceleration to tell you grams, which could be slightly off depending where you are on earth?

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

I thought that you were on to something and did a quick google search: the variation is apparently only 0.5%. And a variation that big is only found when comparing a measurement on the poles (heavier) vs the equator (lighter) and I think it unlikely that this pasta was made on Antarctica. So nope, it's not the reason, they really do owe the op 2 grams of pasta.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.social 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Volume is not mass, and neither of them is weight. A gram is strictly speaking a measure of mass, and we just consider it to be a unit of weight in casual terms because the only frame of reference the vast majority of us have has reasonably constant gravity so we conflate mass and weight. That you can sort of use grams to measure volume is literally only because the density of common stuff (especially water) is close enough for most purposes. It's kinda like measuring a distance in units of time so long as the method of travel is known. I can say "an hour's walk" and I'm not really measuring distance there but you know roughly how far I mean

[–] aoidenpa@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah what about the other one, like drops on a cold beer?