this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
195 points (94.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

29707 readers
1263 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't see why that would be true. People generally fall asleep about as often as they wake up, so the number of people who fall asleep at the same time and the number of people who wake up at the same time, averaged over all moments of a day, should be pretty much equal.

[–] Oiconomia@feddit.de 31 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Na you have large population centers where a lot of alarm clocks go off at exactly 7am. The same people fall asleep over a longer interval of time the night before.

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

that is a good point I didn't think about alarm clocks

I suppose every half hour there would be a surge of people waking up lol

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Plus anyone who does in their sleep.

[–] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Of course there are moments where more people awake at the same time than fall asleep at the same time. In the second 07:00:00 , yeah, more people awake than fall asleep. The same isn't true for 22:13:35. And if you look at all seconds of the day you will find that on average, each second the amount of people that fall asleep is roughly equal to the amount of people waking up.

What you are talking about is variance. There is a higher variance in the times of people falling asleep than there is in the times of people waking up. That does not mean that "more people wake up at the same time than fall asleep". There are times of the day when significantly more people wake up than fall asleep, but as a counterweight, on prettey much all other times, the amount of people falling asleep is slightly higher than the amount of people waking up.

So actually, it's the reverse. Given that most people wake up to alarm clocks, if you pick a random time of the day, it is likely that in that second more people fall asleep than wake up

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

However, that’s not what the title is saying. The title says that more waking times are lumped at the same second in the morning.

[–] Mesa@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

This, and also just that it's not that deep. It's ShowerThoughts, not ShowerEpiphanies.

[–] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The title says "There's more people who wake up at the same second than people who fall asleep at the same second". One could (and most people seem to) interpret this as "the maximum amount of people waking up at any given second is higher than the maximum amount of people falling asleep at any given second", which is a statement I agree with. I interpreted it as "The amount of people waking up at any given time is higher than the amount of people falling asleep at the same time", which is of course false.

It seems we just weren't talking about the same thing. You were talking about the maximum values of both distributions, for which the statement is true, while I only considered the distributions' median and mean values, for which the statement isn't true.

I disagree that the post makes clear OP is referring to the max values, but I guess that's because english is not my first language, and my statistics background likely made me over analyze the statement.