this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
-13 points (46.8% liked)

Political Memes

5430 readers
2024 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If that's the case, why are so many people, regardless of privilege, still miserable? If voting fixed things, shouldn't things be getting fixed? Because it doesn't seem that way to me.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I didn't say voting fixes anything. It doesn't, especially in first past the post two party systems.

I'm saying that the idea that nothing changes is only something you could say if you aren't a member of any of the many demographics that are actively getting their rights stripped away.

Voting may not do much to make things better, but it can absolutely make it magnitudes worse for vulnerable folk.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Absolutely. We don't get to vote for "better" in America. We get "less worse" and "more worse." Voting for less worse just makes sense.

But if you convince people they're voting for "better" and they don't get it, I don't blame them for not voting again.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I know multiple people the entire arc of whose lives were changed by the Obama-era immigration policies. Want me to ask them to tell you how wrong you are?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

the deporter in chief? si, se puede? Obama is a border-hawking, bomb-dropping torture supervisor who extra judicially murdered people on his kill list.

do you know any of those people?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whataboutism says what

I know one guy who got to stay in the US under DACA, and I know one guy who was fighting a legal battle to stay in the country when Obama came into office, and he said fighting his case got easier under Obama. He's still here now (he stayed in limbo for a pretty extended length of time, and eventually got married which resolved the issue).

I am not an expert. I don't know which column of this table the second guy would fit into, or whether the huge reductions in the second column mean that the "deporter in chief" nickname is an unfair characterization based on the relatively-smaller increases in the first column. I just know he said his case got easier.

What do you know about it? What are your sources of information?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

it's not whataboutism to say Obama deported, killed, and tortured people. it's a fact, and it's relevant when discussing his legacy.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What are your sources of information, specifically about his deportations and his immigration policy? Are you basing this on "everyone knows" type of knowledge, and finding it superior to someone relaying to you (edit: ~~firsthand~~) secondhand knowledge and a cited source with an argument?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

feels like you're asking me whether I'm believing statistics over your anecdotes. I am. I am believing statistics over your anecdotes.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Okay, so you don't have a deep familiarity with the topic. It's okay, I'm not really an expert either. But, I've looked at the full statistics (I sent you a table), which add some extremely important facts to the "deporter-in-chief" quick one-liner criticism. And also, I have some secondhand experience with it, which is usually a pretty valuable thing to have when the anecdotes are used in addition to statistics.

So, where did you get your information? Is it just that you know the term "deporter-in-chief" and that deportations went up, because everyone knows those things, and that's it as far as what you know about the topic?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. If I apologize, will you answer the question I asked three times already, and address the statistics I sent and what I said about it?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

an apology is due regardless of whether i give into your petulant demands.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm gonna take that as confirmation that you do, in fact, know literally one fact about Obama's whole immigration policy, and you're just planning to aggressively repeat it to other people and tell them that that's all they need to know about it, too.

Best of luck

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

you don't have a deep familiarity with the topic

wrong