Technology

59414 readers

2768 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

431

FDA says 561 deaths tied to recalled Philips sleep apnea machines (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

FDA says 561 deaths tied to recalled Philips sleep apnea machines::Update from the Food and Drug Agency comes days after Philips said it would stop selling the devices in the U.S.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

This isnt even about the materials breaking down, every product breaks down eventually. But cars from 30 years ago have better critical air path separation than that.... how badly did they fuck up the engineering to even make it possible for housing components to get sucked into the intake?

Oh, it probably would have cost an additional $0.45 per unit to inject the housing in a different way that provides a hard barrier between the mechanicals and air intake so it got shitcanned...

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Maybe more like $0.05. But yeah..

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well either way the extra profit is worth the realized potential carnage. Oh well I guess, no one will go to jail anyway

[–] Arcka@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I'm not sure, but your comment seems to imply an assumption that the foam was designed to be external to the air path and is getting unintentionally sucked in? That's not the case, the foam is literally only inside an "air chamber" that the air directly travels through.