this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
78 points (91.5% liked)

utility cycling

648 readers
1 users here now

๐Ÿšด๐Ÿšฒ Welcome to the Utility Cycling Community! ๐Ÿšฒ๐Ÿšด

Are you a passionate cyclist who believes that bicycles can transform the way we move around our cities and towns? Are you interested in exploring the world of utility biking, where bicycles are a tool for practicality, sustainability, and adventure? If so, you've come to the right place!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] potustheplant@feddit.nl -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, goog luck using that and not getting robbed in my city. Some things might sound sensible on paper, not so much in the real world.

[โ€“] django@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The real world does not consist of your city exclusively.

[โ€“] stark@mastodon.mit.edu 3 points 9 months ago

@django @potustheplant more to the point... I'm not sure what the solution is to crime but I'm pretty sure it's not for each citizen to be in their own steel and glass bubble.

[โ€“] potustheplant@feddit.nl -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True. Which is why saying generically saying "people" is not correct considering that not every city can be traversed in a bike due to a large number of reasons.

[โ€“] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I think you are taking the people to mean "everybody" which I agree would not be true, but people is still correct as a plural of person as long as more than one person does prefer the bike, which is almost guaranteed.

Now whether saying people in a statistical sense means more than 50% or whatever metric we like is up to the reader, but that is a much less normalized standard.