this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
368 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reuters reports that AI-related companies lost $190 billion in stock market value on Tuesday following disappointing earnings reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eltrain123@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

The current state of AI development is going to cost a ton of money until its maturity. Any company that is in “AI” right now is either intentionally spending billions of dollars to solve AGI, which will ultimately open up trillions in marketplace solutions, or is using the press to market fledgling AI “solutions” or “integrations” with fancier versions of narrow AI.

AGI is in its infancy and is progressing on an exponential curve. The first time anyone heard of ChatGPT was 14 months ago and , with proper prompting, it’s already easy to use to write college level essays and is passing higher education tests like SAT, GRE, medical exams, CPA certifications, and the bar. Think of what will happen when it hits its toddler stage, let alone adolescence or maturity.

Any way you look at it, the days of hearing about AI are just starting and it will dominate the press in the next decade.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Any company that is in “AI” right now is either intentionally spending billions of dollars to solve AGI

Lol, no, that's another field entirely. They make the tools an AGI could use someday.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

or we might be failing to understand severe limitations with this model which would ultimately reach its ceiling very short of anything that can reason

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

LLMs don't really fall under AGI, they're still static statistical models. Some RL algorithms might be on the track of AGI, but I'm not sure about that.