Technology

59598 readers

3551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

142

Pentagon ex-UFO chief says conspiracy theorists in government drive spending (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pentagon ex-UFO chief says conspiracy theorists in government drive spending::Sean Kirkpatrick, the first director of the all-domain anomaly resolution office, blames ‘core group’ of government workers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zoboomafoo 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As Kirkpatrick described in his own words, the extent of his investigation of whistleblower claims amounted to asking the government’s secret-keepers if a certain illegal program existed. Kirkpatrick’s approach, as astute observers have noted, is roughly akin to asking a mob boss if he is engaging in illegal activity, and subsequently being satisfied with a “no.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4432225-what-has-happened-to-the-pentagons-former-ufo-hunter/

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But why is it always just the Americans?

There are many other countries out there. You'd expect something to come from them

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

If such programs exist, other countries may not want to show their hand if they know they trail behind the US. Sightings themselves could always be concealed due to national security concerns. Then there's just the possibility of lack of interest or negligence in documenting UAP.