this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
16 points (78.6% liked)

Android

17690 readers
37 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stormio@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (4 children)

"Compact powerhouse" caught my attention. Unfortunately, "compact" is a 6.36 inch screen.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

You need to talk about the overall phone size, not just the screen size.

In the real world, this phone is barely bigger than a Galaxy S5, yet the screen is a full 1.3 inches larger due to the much much smaller bezels.

In 2024, that's definitely compact. We're not going back to iPhone 3GS dimensions.

That said, I'd still never buy a Xiaomi product, no matter how good the reviews are.

[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's still significantly bigger than the zenfone 10 or the iPhone and screen size matters more to some of us than the overall size.

Call it a not huge phone or something. Compact should mean something.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's still significantly bigger than the zenfone 10 or the iPhone

Umm... sorry for bringing facts into the discussion but...

Xiaomi 14: 153mm x 71mm (10,863mmΒ² frontal area)

iPhone 15: 148mm x 72mm (10,656mmΒ² frontal area)

Zenphone 10: 147mm x 68mm (9,996mmΒ² frontal area)

It's less than 2% larger than an iPhone, which you purport to be compact. Is 2% larger really "significantly bigger" to you?

It's about the same as a 10 year old flagship phone. Stop looking at screen sizes and thinking "wow this phone must be HUGE!"

[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

6mm taller is a lot when you're looking for a small phone, especially using one handed. 3mm is a lot for width too. Now compare it to a true compact like the iPhone mini or Sony compact series and it's huge. Personally I would not call any of these compact, and if you are going to include a phone with a 6.3" screen, then it loses all meaning.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Mate come on you're moving the goalposts now. First an iPhone is compact now it's not? Make your mind up!

The iPhone mini is long gone and the Xperia compact series is long gone too. Nobody bought them.

And no, the 6.3" screen doesn't make it lose meaning. If the bezels shrink and the screen grows but the phone is the same size... then the phone is the same size.

My laptop, thanks to modern slim bezels, has a 14.something inch screen in a space that traditionally would've had a 13 inch screen.

Is it less compact because the screen is larger? Your argument is that the laptop has grown, despite the dimensions staying the same.

[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Bezels stopped mattering a long time ago. The overall height of this phone is 6mm taller than the zenfone and 5mm taller than the iPhone.

You're saying if ford discontinued all models except for the F350, we could call the short box version a compact truck.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

It's 2% larger than a phone you happily called compact.

Stop moving goalposts.

Bezels do matter. Their shrinking has allowed for large screens on phones without increasing the size. Comparing compactness of phones by their screen size rather than actual size is misguided.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by bringing facts into this :((

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For some of us, 6.3in screen with 100% screen to body ratio is still too large.

At 100% Id want 5.0in.
In today's phone standards 4.5-4.8in seems reasonable.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So not a phone from 10 years ago, one from earlier.

Similar in size to a Nokia 3310 from 2000? H: 113, W: 48 therefore diagonal size is 123mm or 4.8/4.9 inches.

To me it seems like there'd be a severe usability penalty there, but if that's what you want.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was thinking the traditional 16:10 form factor. Essentially, a touch screen phone narrow enought that you could hold without the "pinky shelf" grip.
But also short enough that you can reach all four corners of the screen without adjusting your grip.

The iPod touches achieved this with their form factor.

There was an experimental phone some time between Android 2.3 and 4.4 that had it's entire UI designed around the thumbs mobility.
It was drowned out under Android and iOS's popularity, but I insist that they had the right idea.

[–] pizzazz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Custom roms for them absolutely slap. Posting this from a still perfectly functional mi9 with Android 14.

[–] limerod@reddthat.com 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, unfortunately we are way past 6 inches. It's unlikely to make a return.

[–] AzureRT@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

I think I've heard someone call a 6.7 screen compact. Times are crazy

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thanks for saving me the time. πŸ˜”