this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)
Individual Climate Action
155 readers
1 users here now
Discuss actions that we can directly take as individuals to reduce environmental harm.
related communities (decentralized only)
somewhat closely related to individual action:
- !vegan@slrpnk.net - Chatter on reducing GHG by way of reducing consumption of animal products (not necessarily environment-specific)
- !vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !veganism@sopuli.xyz
- !vegan@hexbear.net - Another vegan community, but apparently unreachable from slrpnk.net
- !activist_investing@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
- !nolawns@slrpnk.net - Landscaping in diverse low-waste ways
- !buyitforlife@slrpnk.net - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !buyitforlife@discuss.tchncs.de - Buy stuff that lasts a long time, if you must buy something
- !fixing@slrpnk.net - fix it, don’t replace it
- !fixit@disflux.org
- !righttorepair@midwest.social - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !right2repair@discuss.tchncs.de - exercise your right to fix stuff
- !sustainabletech@lemmy.sdf.org - sustainable technology
- !permacomputing@lemmy.sdf.org - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !permacomputing@slrpnk.net - To discuss computing that’s not resource intensive
- !zerowaste@slrpnk.net - To discuss waste avoidance
- !anticonsumption@sopuli.xyz
- !solarpunktravel@slrpnk.net - sustainable travel, if you must travel
less closely related to individual action:
- !collapse@slrpnk.net
- !collapse@sopuli.xyz
- !energy@slrpnk.net - For chatter specifically related to green energy
- !degrowth@slrpnk.net - Economics of reducing excessive consumption
- !cdr@slrpnk.net - Discuss CO₂ removal
- !treehuggers@slrpnk.net - Discuss forestation and reforestation
- !reclamation@slrpnk.net - Discuss reclaiming disturbed lands
- ~~!climate@slrpnk.net~~ ← ⚠ moderator locked a civil, on-topic, science-supported post without cause (see “The core of the climate social problem: stubbornness. The mitigating effect of psilocybin is worth a look” in the modlog)
- !climate@lemmy.stad.social
- !climate_lm@slrpnk.net ← climate change discussion without excessive moderation
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe such lists would fall under election financing laws and NGOs usually do not do it. Political donations should go to parties and allowing NGOs to interfere in elections would open up a path to influence them. So I presume most everybody has made it illegal.
Other then that you have two groups in the EU parliament which are more to the left. Those are Greens-EFA and GUE/NGL, which are environmentally conscious and left. Greens-EFA is generally pro liberal democracy and pro EU, whereas the GUE/NGL is further to the left often old communist parties and tends to be anti EU. Other then that you have S&D is made up of old social democratic parties, so center left, might be worth it, if you do not have another choice. Renew are a bunch of hardcore neoliberals, EPP are center right conservatives, ID and ECR are fascists. Most parties in the EU, which actually can win elections are in the EU parliament, so for a general overview that is intressting. However individual issues are another thing and can be rather complicated. Great example is Renew the biggest French member is Macrons En Marche, which has some background from the French social democrats and does some actually usefull stuff. They are in constant beef with the German FDP and Dutch VVD both of which are also Renew members and take the most neoliberal position on environmental policy. Also other things matter and when it comes to cutting social welfare En March and FDP VVD show why they are in a political group.