this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
777 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5787 readers
3363 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poopsmith@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I wonder how these hold up in fires.

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I've seen hay bales catch fire from being too wet, no way I'm building a house out of that.

[–] sic_1@feddit.de 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, same as wood, who would build houses out of that? /s

Hay is great insulation and it's sealed with protective material anyway in modern houses. Also, even if not: Some tribes make houses out of hay or straw and those houses are quite great in their particular circumstances. There are experiments to use hay bales for structural support as well and it holds up surprisingly well.

Also, fun fact: wooden houses are less dangerous in case of fire than houses made of steel and concrete because the steel rod reinforcements start becoming soft at low temperatures (~200°C) and crash. Wooden houses announce crashing when burning, concrete buildings don't.

[–] HeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Something something jet fuel...

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How does that work? Too wet with kerosene?

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The moisture and organic material causes mold and bacteria to form and create heat. Because hay is a good insulator, heat will build up more and more. Once the hay gets to a certain temperature flammable gases are formed and can combust from the heat.

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

And as the heat raises, it becomes perfect for other bacterias, which start to multiply too, increasing more the heat

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Straw is compressed in the walls, so not to let oxygen go through, and it doesn't get wet as the wall is covered with clay inside and outside.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But the moisture content of the straw matters BEFORE it gets sealed. A stack of a thousand damp bales can heat and combust. And it's the interior damp bales that heat and start the fire.

They can get wet waiting for transport to the jobsite, they can get wet during transportation, and they can get wet during building.

I'm not saying a strawbale house can't be well built, but it's not a "one size fits all" solution for every location.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, of course it has to be dry.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And that is the trick isn't it. A piece of wood gets rained on, it isn't effected much if at all. When the sun comes out, it dries in less than an hour. But bales are much like sponges, they soak up water easily and dry out very, very, very slowly.

Just how much do you try the average construction crew to keep those bales dry on a job site?

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well your average construction crew doesn't build straw bale houses. The three I worked on it was a thing of real concern. We keep the bails covered before they were stacked. We would let the pile breathe during the day and cover at night. We would only stack a wall when we knew it would get finished and have the top cover on before the end of the day. And the exterior was sealed very early where the interior sealing was one of the last things to happen.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

The point is the, the "average" construction crews build the vast majority of structures around the world. And you are correct - they aren't qualified.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Building clay-and-straw houses is not suitable for mass construction, I guess.

You could say you need to live on the site :)

[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It is on par with building a ground up stick house. Sure it doesn't beat any kind of prefab or cook cutter houses. But neither does any other method.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No they probably aren't suitable for mass use. But, for one-offs they can be viable choices if you get a high quality contractor and construction crew that knows what is needed to build the structure correctly.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The ones I saw were built by volunteers :D

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Were they volunteers from the local pub?

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, from international civic service.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

So people who were highly motivated to do things right. And not your average contracting crew that needs to do the work as cheaply and fast as possible and get to the next job quickly.

[–] homoludens@feddit.de 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Astongt615@lemmy.one 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So flammable mater + low airflow is somehow more fire resistant than flame resistant mater + low airflow? Looks like the source is pure marketing unless their comparable insulation is perforated cardboard coated in fuel gel.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Roof/attic often uses rockwool or glasswool. Wall insulation is often something like XPS, PIR or PUR.

Although it sounds counterintuitive, I can see straw doused in flame retardant being better than supposedly flame retardant polystyrene foam made from hydrocarbons. I mean, just look at what happened with Grenfell Tower.

[–] Deebster@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

flame removedant

lemmy.ml is replacing some of your word with another one. Good ol' Scunthorpe problem!

[–] Astongt615@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"doused in flame retardant" isn't mentioned in the source as far as I saw, plus it would affect the eco-friendly, workability, cost effectiveness, and biodegradability benefits mentioned (though the last one is worthy of debate as a pro or con in the first place). Everything has its tradeoffs unfortunately. This could be the better side for some surely.

[–] homoludens@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago

From what I have read they are using a loam layer on both sides of the wall, I doubt that this affects eco-friendliness and biodegradability. And they are F90 certificated. source

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From the article…

Since straw bales are tightly packed, they do not burn as easily as certain other materials. The tight packing reduces airflow, something that is critical to sustain a fire. While there is some fire risk during the construction phase (as is the case with many building materials), once the home is finished, it’s flame retardant nature decreases the risk, usually resulting in a home that better resists burning than a traditional stick built house.

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

"...better than a traditional stick built house"

I'm thinking of brick, what do we think folks? Seems like we have three possible building materials with one clear winner amirite?

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Only the big bad wolf can help us decide

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how brick is the "one clear winner".

A straw and clay house is better insulated and you need no cement. It has pros and cons.

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Try taking out Big Bad Wolf insurance in a stick house bud

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I live in center Europe, here people don't insure houses.

[–] JamesStallion@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"nothing goes over my head, my reflexes are too fast" -Kilgore Trout

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well hemp bricks hold up well so I am guessing they improved upon this too to be more fire retardant

[–] sysadmin420@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Man I'd love a hemp brick house.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

If it's treated with a fire retardant like sodium borate, pretty well. They use the same chemical for cellulose (shredded newspaper) insulation.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I wonder how these hold up in fires.

Only sell to non-smokers.