this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
65 points (62.6% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6323 readers
141 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Continuing to increase the world population is absolutely nuts.

*I'm not interested in gradual natural declines from whatever factors. 2 max implemented now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People get children without being a couple.

What even is the definition of a couple and why should that determine the number?

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Good point. The obvious, and unpopular, take would probably be per uterus insteadnof per couple, since that is almost completely trackable, unlike paternity.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ooo, do women have the power or are they a commodity valued on ability to have kids. Will this be a boon for feminine rights or a massive step backwards.

I smell a new post

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget to like and ring that bell

(I felt dirty even typing that as a joke)

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Great, now I've got to go reinstall borderlands

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

This is already a tracked statistic. It's called the fertility rate. Yes, it's tracked per uterus, and it's actually been falling precipitously for decades:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN

[–] Damage 1 points 9 months ago

yeah no, that's discriminatory