this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

AskBeehaw

2002 readers
2 users here now

An open-ended community for asking and answering various questions! Permissive of asks, AMAs, and OOTLs (out-of-the-loop) alike.

In the absence of flairs, questions requesting more thought-out answers can be marked by putting [SERIOUS] in the title.

Subcommunity of Chat

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
thrawn21@beehaw.org
UngodlyAudrey@beehaw.org
2
ELI5: Why can't defederation be one sided? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago by LimitedBrain@beehaw.org to c/askbeehaw@beehaw.org
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think I understand how the federation system works currently and I'm not sure if I think this is a good thing, but why does federation require the entire link between communities to be broken?

Like say that Community A wants to block out Community B. That's fine, but can Community B still see posts on A? And if not, why not?

And to go further, if I'm part of Community A and I still want to interact with Community B, why can't I? Like is there a reason for forcing users to only interact with communities that are federated?

Again, I understand there are restrictions with data and how things currently work. I'm just asking from an abstract perspective about the fundamental ideas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almar_quigley@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d imagine you can’t allow a community to read only and not comment to another so that would necessitate defederation being bi-directional.

[–] LimitedBrain@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

But would it be possible to have it read only? Or would that break functionality somehow (providing you at least inform the user they cannot comment or vote)?