this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
365 points (96.4% liked)

Fediverse

28385 readers
1196 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems like an interesting effort. A developer is building an alternative Java-based backend to Lemmy's Rust-based one, with the goal of building in a handful of different features. The dev is looking at using this compatibility to migrate their instance over to the new platform, while allowing the community to use their apps of choice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I’m a Java developer and I would much rather pick up Rust to join an active project than try to rebuild something that already works using a less-marketable language.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Sure, but it’s a lot more work for you to get to a point where you can be an active contributor.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Is it really a lot of work for an experienced dev? I can pick up most new languages in a day or 2 unless it's a total paradigm shift.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago

1-2 days is enough to learn the basics, but I doubt you’ll be as nearly as productive as with something you’ve been using for years. Keep in mind that new languages also mean new frameworks, etc, some which take years to actually master, but at least months to get a good handle on them.

Also, from my understanding, Rust is a bit of a paradigm shift.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)