this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
270 points (93.3% liked)

Games

32572 readers
2064 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
shitpostpolice@lemmy.world
Dremor@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
270
Cities: Skylines 2 developers have noticed 'a growing tendency of toxicity in our community' (www.techradar.com)
submitted 10 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/games@lemmy.world
192 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • Developers of Cities: Skylines 2 have noticed a growing toxicity in their community, which is affecting engagement and creativity.
  • The CEO of Colossal Order expressed concern about the negative impact of toxicity on the team and the community.
  • The developers still encourage helpful criticism from the community but ask for it to be constructive and kind.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/mVaIY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Toxicity is inexcusable.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Greed is inexcusable.

Toxicity is a consequence.

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's a video game, you really don't have to play it. Just don't buy it if you don't like the devs so much.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 0 points 10 months ago

I didn't. I never played the game. I wanted to play the first one but then saw how many DLCs it has. I don't like this way of developing software, in bits and pieces, so I didn't want to support it. This changes nothing about the rest of the discussion though.

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Are we defending/justifying toxicity now?

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because someone chooses to be greedy doesn’t make it right for someone else to be toxic.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly, if one person or entity chooses to act shifty, then it should be okay to be shitty back. Please, let's have consequences. Let's not "let it slide" in the name of decorum or politeness. What motivation would people have to act less shitty in the future if everyone just turns the cheek and deals with it? Lol

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I don’t agree. Being better rather than the same is what makes the difference.

[–] Chriswild@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Depends on what the greed is applied to. For a video game it's whatever but for medicine I completely disagree.