this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
240 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59436 readers
3509 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google is getting worse as it loses its fight against search engine spam::Aggressive SEO tactics are ruining search results on Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo, a team of researchers in Germany says.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sadly haven't found a search engine that beats it

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Adding “site:” before a search string can help if you know what you’re looking for. Like site:wikipedia or site:GitHub.com

This kills off AI spam by constricting search results to pages from that site.

But google’s other problem that this doesn’t solve (just like Amazon) is that the first few results are always paid ads, and not actual search results.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, except if I knew beforehand which site has the results I need, why would I even use Google?

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Sites that have discussions almost always have useless search functions. Using site: on those would likely give you better results then searching globally (even if it takes multiple searches).