this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2973 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59232 readers
3756 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yikes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's kind of a gray area though. Do you just jail the CEO if a company does evil? What if it was someone else inside the company and the CEO didn't know? And conversely, what if the CEO knew and is trying to pass off like they didn't, how do you prove it? It turns into slippery slopes pretty fast.

My personal solution would be just to actually scale up the fines. If someone gets fined for something they profited from, it's extremely stupid for the fine to be less than their profit. You're basically telling them to do it again.

[–] Risk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, aren't CEOs massive pay justified because they supposedly take on ultimate responsibility for the company?

If a company does something criminal under their watch, then even if they didn't give the orders they have been criminally negligent - surely?

Now, mind, I don't think that they should necessarily be the person punished most - the person's down the chain more responsible should serve more time. But the person at the top shouldn't get away free.

Regardless though I agree - fines with teeth are the most important thing.

[–] Risk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, aren't CEOs massive pay justified because they supposedly take on ultimate responsibility for the company?

If a company does something criminal under their watch, then even if they didn't give the orders they have been criminally negligent - surely?

Now, mind, I don't think that they should necessarily be the person punished most - the person's down the chain more responsible should serve more time. But the person at the top shouldn't get away free.

Regardless though I agree - fines with teeth are the most important thing.