this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
103 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37724 readers
454 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If you think about it, a fee per app download is a lot less flexible when it comes to monetising purchases. Means free apps either become paid or shove into you a lot more micro transactions. That exact model is what made devs get mad at unity (although unity doesn’t provide the download infrastructure and it was on top of a cut)

[–] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Fair. I still don’t think that entitles Apple to a cut of purchases in the app, but you’re right that a download fee sucks.