this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
147 points (98.0% liked)

science

14791 readers
84 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A team of psychologists, social scientists, philosophers and evolutionary researchers affiliated with multiple institutions in the U.S. has found evidence suggesting that the slight advantage males have in navigation ability is likely due to differences in the ways male and female children are raised.

In their paper published in the journal Royal Society Open Science, the group describes how they studied navigational skills in multiple species to find out if there might be an evolutionary basis for one gender or the other having better skills.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I was part of a small study in the army that attempted to teach us land nav using our preferred "style" (no idea if the study got published). They gave us a test to determine if we learned directions better through landmarks or directions. Overwhelmingly it was landmarks. The US army is also largely made up of men.

I know this is all anecdotal but when lost in the woods most men and women that I know default to landmarks. Older generations of men who were in the military were probably taught to navigate mostly via directions (i.e. compass directions) which may be where the preference/stereotype came from in past generations.

[โ€“] GluWu@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

Were the directions shit tho?

I use distance and direction, but I'm from the desert where that's all there is, there are no landmarks. I've developed my natural compass from just knowing the sun on the sky.