this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
330 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
4262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Private security footage is nothing new to criminal investigations, but two factors are rapidly changing the landscape: huge growth in the number of devices with cameras, and the fact that footage usually lands in a cloud server, rather than on a tape.

When a third party maintains the footage on the cloud, it gives police the ability to seek the images directly from the storage company, rather than from the resident or business owner who controls the recording device. In 2022, the Ring security company, owned by Amazon, admitted that it had provided audio and video from customer doorbells to police without user consent at least 11 times. The company cited “exigent circumstances.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240116132800/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/01/13/police-video-surveillance-california

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 43 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

The perks of being an electronic security installer and wiring up your own house with a real system with a dozen PoE cameras and a local NVR under your control only...😋

Stay away from the Harry Homeowner cloud-connected lick-and-stick BestBuy bullshit.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I use unifi. I have their dream machine (router/firewall/vpn) a POE switch, two access points, 5 cameras and their doorbell. I rarely have any issues.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Do you have particular recommendations? I somehow landed on Reolink as the option I'm going to buy in a few months

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you want something easy but not necessarily the cheapest, UniFi will do.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I like UniFi but they aren't inexpensive and to really make them work you have to go balls deep into the UniFi ecosystem. I HAVE that ecosystem and still went with Reolink for my cameras.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah they’re not crazy expensive but not cheap either, and I’m not a fan of Ubiquiti as a company. There are definitely better alternatives, I just don’t know anything that somebody who’s only used shitty cloud connected garbage could jump right into

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Reolink is perfectly fine. They can be setup with or without internet, just remember to put them on their own VLAN that doesn't have Internet access. If you don't want to use the Reolink NVR then build yourself a frigrate box or similar.

Mine don't have internet access and I can watch their feeds directly when I'm home and through my Home Assistant rig when I'm away.

[–] USSEthernet@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago

Bit expensive, but I run all Ubiquiti network and camera equipment.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Probably avoid anything by Hikvision if you don't want to risk having Chinese backdoors in it. My own system is just a hodgepodge of different used cams I pulled off job sites. Just need to make sure they can do ONVIF and they should be compatible with any NVR out there.

[–] soysauce@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 10 months ago

If the cameras are on a private network with no routes to the Internet a backdoor doesn't really matter. I would still avoid untrustworthy manufacturers.

[–] SocialEngineer56@notdigg.com 2 points 10 months ago

I’m using Reolink and highly recommend it. Without a doubt the best bang for your buck. I bought a bundle on Black Friday a couple years ago with the 2TB NVR and 4 cameras (5MP POE) for a couple hundred dollars, and I’ve since expanded to 6 cameras.

I’m in the process of setting up a NAS, so hoping I can get reolink backed up on it for easy access.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ubiquiti used to be the only one I knew about that I could host and block internet access. Is there anything else these days? Ubiquiti stuff is kinda shit these days.