this post was submitted on 11 May 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
743 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Makes sense, right?🤦‍♂️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rysiek@szmer.info 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Dunno, let's ask prof. Turley how much would he say a hallucinated-up charge of sexual misconduct against him is worth in damages maybe?

Or ask the families falsely accused by AI of defrauding the Dutch state on welfare how much money (not to mention time and emotional harm) they lost because of these accusations?

AI harms are already meaningful and very, very real.

[–] tardigrada@beehaw.org 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

There is a good report by Lighthouse, a Dutch media collective, about the families falsely accused by their state. There's a high number of similar cases like the one of Prof. Torley's, and such 'false positives' will always happen as they are inherent to such analyses.

The point for me here is that this guy from Microsoft likely knows that (or, in case he doesn't, there are certainly a lot of experts at MS who know it as we can reasonably assume). What I don't understand is that executives get often away with such statements, journalists rarely raise the issue of biases these models have. I feel that is not understood by the masses, and companies and governments exploit that use it against the people.

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

there are certainly a lot of experts at MS who know it as we can reasonably assume

Well they did fire their whole ethics and society team within their AI branch. So…

journalists rarely raise the issue of biases these models have. I feel that is not understood by the masses, and companies and governments exploit that use it against the people.

This is very true. For what it's worth I wrote a bunch about AI for a somewhat mainstream Polish news portal. And I do focus on these issues:

But there is absolutely a lot of just press-release copy-pasting and fueling the hype out there.

[–] ailiphilia@feddit.it 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Thanks for this. As for my side, I'm afraid my Polish has too much potential to read this 😁 but it's great that such initiatives exist. We defintitely needed more of them. But maybe I should stop complaining and start my own small blog together with a couple of peers as we have been discussing for some time 😇

[–] rysiek@szmer.info 5 points 2 years ago

I think that's a swell idea. The more actual people (as opposed to corporations their PR departments) engaged in the debate, the better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)