this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
316 points (98.5% liked)

World News

38970 readers
2575 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dmian@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago (3 children)

He took measures in his first days that produced rises in both food and fuel, two of the biggest components of inflation. You think that may have influenced or not? I mean…

[–] Javi_in_4k@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He actually said that was going to happen. Argentina has been. Subsiding fuel and food and removing the subsidies would lead to short term inflation since the price of both is no longer artificially low.

[–] Dmian@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If he said the measures HE took were going to cause inflation, how is that the previous government's fault? This is what I find funny. He said "25% inflation is great! We were going to much worse inflation! We should congratulate the Economy Minister", but at the same time, you say the measurements he took were going to cause inflation. So... how did they avoid a worse inflation?

I'm sorry, but some people don't want to see reality, just want to believe everything will be good in the end, but are not being critical with this government (something people should always do, regardless of who they voted for), and everything the government do is fine with them, no matter how incoherent the discourse is, or how harmful those measures are.

[–] Javi_in_4k@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

The measures would lead to higher inflation in short term but decrease in the long term. It actually is sound economically.