this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2631 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
3106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 426 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Elon going to complain about another conspiracy going on while in reality it's just that when crawlers are not able to open a certain URL they simply assume that the page doesn't exist anymore. Google certainly didn't "retaliate", bots simply couldn't find those pages anymore.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 217 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The headline is actually wrong. Google did not do anything to Twitter. Twitter fucked up their own SEO by removing access to its content.

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is correct.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a pretty easy and reasonable conclusion to come to if you think about if for more than five seconds. I'm not sure Elon has any toes left after he keeps shooting himself in the feet.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your company cares about it's SEO rankings, you don't make changes like these without considering the SEO implications.

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Not even a month later and said company rebranded itself without checking trademarks. Now we have "X", a brand that non only risks infringement of quite a few registered eu-trademarks but didn't even apply for an own eu-trademark...

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like reddit. Looks like the Speztic and the Elongated Muskrat are caught in an ouroborus of like-minded stupidity.

[–] randomwither@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Elongated Muskrat 🤣

[–] bingbong@lemmy.world 126 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The latest in a seemingly never-ending series of self-owns. Apart from the stress it must put on their devs, it's been entertaining

[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They have more than one dev left?

[–] marswarrior@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No it's just one guy called Dev.

[–] paper_clip@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago

And he's on a H1B visa and can't leave.

[–] CalOtsu@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude was just a marketing intern and is mad stressed and knows he's in WAY over his head now.

[–] WiseassWolfOfYoitsu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fake it 'till you make it.

Or the multibillion dollar company collapses into a heaping, flaming pile of slag as a result of your actions. One or the other.

It’s a win/win

[–] Indie@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They screwed up his name tag, because reasons.

His name is actually Dave. But there aren't any other Dave's working there anymore so he is ok with being called Dev.

Deb on the other hand is pretty pissed off.

[–] marswarrior@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Or maybe it's this guy, Dev from a canadian tv show called The Listener. They called the hacker 'Dev', I'm assuming it's on purpose.
https://thelistener.fandom.com/wiki/Dev_Clark

[–] cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding is there's group of people whose visa is sponsored by Twitter. If they leave the company, they may well have to leave the country.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.fmhy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a big yikes and I hope they will find another way...

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Coercing workers built America! They can't leave... because of the implication.

[–] SolarNialamide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you gonna hurt these workers?

Yeah, he lives in the break room on a cot.

[–] OldFartPhil@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MisterMoo@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Twitter’s dev(s)

[–] coffeetest@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crawl issues I am sure but also user experience issues. Google is sensitive to sending visitors to sites where metrics indicate users do not, like bounce rates etc. I don't use twt but if it is the case you have the be logged in to see anything now, a non-logged in user will click a link from Google hit a login page, and use the back button. I would assume Google will see that as a bad search result and use it less.

[–] zen_symian@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

that actually makes a lot of sense

[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

The word bots triggers the muskrat.

[–] cousinofjah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if Google prioritized recrawling all those Twitter links.

[–] Pseu@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I were making a web crawler, I would make it so that if a crawler finds a domain that appears to have changed dramatically or gone offline it will re-crawl the domain and flag already-crawled pages as potentially obsolete.