this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
175 points (88.2% liked)

Technology

34438 readers
160 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neptune@dmv.social 43 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Imaging explaining to a jury:

A statistical model says that there is a 99% chance these two finger prints belong to the same person. We don't know how this model works and it was not programmed by a human. We will be taking no further questions.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The jury: sounds like magic to me! Sounds good!

[–] ram@bookwormstory.social 9 points 8 months ago

If we rig the jury to all be Silicon Valley investors and CEOs, you just have to say "AI" and you'll win the case.

[–] zout@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Imagine finding a suspect with this method, and not taking their actual finger prints to check if the match is correct.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They do know how it works: it detected a pattern in the difference between fingers and checks that.

Also this would usually not be needed explained to a jury. If they have the suspect in custody they can just check their fingerprints directly.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That's again 2 fingerprints to compare: one from the crime scene, and one from the suspect.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah but comparing a fingerprint to a finger is a simpler test than comparing a fingerprint to another fingerprint and checking if they may be two fingers from the same person.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You could hypothetically show the jury literally ALL of the math!

[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago

This is my biggest issue with AI. ChatGPT is a nice party trick, but how do you ensure the results are correct?

I used to hate having to show my work when I was younger. But as I have gotten older, I realized the result isn't as important as how you got there.