this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
113 points (93.8% liked)

News

23275 readers
3589 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
113
Researchers demonstrate that quantum entanglement and topology are inextricably linked (phys.org)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The team hopes that this might become a powerful tool that paves the way for new quantum communication protocols that use topology as an alphabet for quantum information processing across entanglement-based channels.

The findings reported in the article are crucial because researchers have grappled for decades with developing techniques to preserve entangled states. The fact that topology remains intact even as entanglement decays suggests a potentially new encoding mechanism that utilizes entanglement, even in scenarios with minimal entanglement where traditional encoding protocols would fail.

Edit: Here is the quoted article link.

And here's is the published paper.

Edit: someone below linked to this so you don't have to pay for knowledge

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's confusing but I think this is the article

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Science reporting list the authors or the institutions or the paper being published. There isn't even a DOI. So, I can't even say if any of this has gone through peer review or been published in a reputable journal. It's not really an article. The whole thing reads like OP copied a couple paragraphs out of the middle of a university press release.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sorry I meant to include the link.

And here's is the link to the published paper

[–] WEFshill202@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or for those without paid access: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04690

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Awesome, thank you!

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Much obliged. Thank you.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Not a very good one, where's the source?