this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
1031 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
4012 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 117 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Just add 2 things:

  1. Cookie settings are possible to set in the browser for all pages.
  2. There's a reject all button on every cookie banner.
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  1. There’s a reject all button on every cookie banner.

Most importantly, those banners should be streamiled to look the same at the very least. No highlighing "ACCEPT ALL" while graying out "reject all" nonsense. No swapping the buttons left and right, top to bottom trickery. I'd prefer if the browser takes care of it all, though. I'm already using a plugin for that, though it comes with draw backs.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I am using „I still don‘t care about cookies“ for Firefox. It basically auto-selects the least required cookies possible. Though some sites don‘t offer opt-out so it will automatically accept those cookies. Not perfect, but I really can‘t be bothered to do a cookie captcha every time I open a private tab for example.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Right, this!

Tired of all the dark patterns.

[–] iain@feddit.nl 59 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, just ban the collection of user data and selling to 3rd parties. Enormous fines for anyone still doing it. Destroy this entire industry please.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The EU is primarily pro-business, but that also means being against anti-competitive and underhanded business practices

The browser thing sounds like a good solution (although there must be a reason why DNT headers weren't made legally binding, potentially as they wanted to allow people to pick and choose what cookies they allow based on what they thought was "too far" or something but that's conjecture), however disallowing all user data will likely lead to companies not being able to advertise to people who are interested in their products, something which the EU will see as a negative and would also cause an uptick in scams and misinformation as you see in low quality advertising space at the moment

[–] iain@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This comment got to me really late, probably to Lemmy's distributed nature.

But I still want to add: of course business will make more money if you allow more practices, but selling personal data just has too many negative consequences.

Also low quality advertising? You mean like billboards and in the newspaper? You mean regular advertising?

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I mean "[local town] grandma discovers 10 foods you never knew you should avoid" or even downright scams when I say low quality advertising

Also "negative consequences" is a bit overdramatic and I'd love you to elaborate... Really it's down to the person's own opinion, eg you don't like it so you'll reject that sort of thing, meanwhile I don't mind it especially as a way of paying for decent quality media so I'll allow it on some sites but not others

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  1. No there most definitely is not. Most banners have a big yes button, and you need to scroll to a settings button and then do five more things to not get cookies.
[–] Maestro@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago

He said that should be added

[–] PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So true. And then you have Schibsted, Norways biggest media conglomerate; the only way to reject cookies is that you have to log in in order to reject it! According to the cookie law (no idea what it's called), it's illegal. It's been reported to the EU and Norwegian government numerous times, but nothing happens. Fuck Schibsted!!

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In my experience a lot of italian (particularly "news") websites basically say "accept cookies or sign up for our paid subscription"

[–] Damage 1 points 10 months ago

Incognito and accept all

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I meant it should be added as a default thing you have in every one of those things.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But even if you reject all, you still allow them to track you through the legitimate interest cookies

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

That doesn't sound like a legitimate interest and should be fined or something.

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

well, not on every cookie banner

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml -5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The reject all is already a thing. (Well is not all all, but reject all except necessary but those doesn't matter much, they are not tracking).

That said usually is not called this way as obvious, sometimes is just "reject" without the all, "accept only necessary", "decline", etc or you have to close the banner etc or they use some other confusing pattern.