this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
117 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59197 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Gfycat service is being discontinued. Please save or delete your Gfycat content by visiting https://www.gfycat.com and logging in to your account. After September 1, 2023, all Gfycat content and data will be deleted from gfycat.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess it's just impossible to make these types of large media storage sites profitable. The business model itself is inherently unprofitable despite there being a need for these sites. Like youtube will never bring a cent back to google, but they keep running it because it locks people into their ecosystem for data harvesting.

Could also be that snap bought gfycat just to kill it.

[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Storage is just the loss leader of the internet, really. Companies will take the loss for access to the data.

[–] Nittick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Eh, your average bear isn’t doing a bunch of hosting. Sure there are folks who do, but the vast majority of the population does not give a shit about hosting. They do care when you interrupt their photo/video storage, though.

[–] cerevant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Free storage. Backblaze is doing just fine.

[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

That is why I called it a loss leader. It is meant to attract people to the ecosystem (hence free), not be the product itself. Of course if you are appropriately creating, pricing, and selling low cost storage as a business model, you will nail it.

[–] dam5s@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Youtube is definitely bringing back a profit to Google. Probably not huge, but definitely far from 0% return.

Now they did have to shove way more ads in there to make it happen.

Having an acceptable ratio between ads and a big media storage seems pretty much impossible, unless subscription based which most people can't really afford.

[–] Rhaedas@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least Google is smart enough to not put limit caps on video views or posts.

[–] xNIBx@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Youtube literally tried to limit 4k videos to paying subscribers but abandoned it(for now)

https://www.gsmarena.com/youtube_turns_off_experiment_that_allowed_4k_playback_only_to_premium_users-news-56193.php