this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
241 points (93.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
474 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
241
What are some things that Linux can't do, but Windows can? (lemmy.zip)
submitted 10 months ago by Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
508 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 64 points 10 months ago (4 children)

At this point, that's kinda the wrong question.

I think Linux is just as if not more capable than Windows is, but the software library has some notable gaps in it. "It can't run Adobe/Autodesk/Ubisoft" That's not Linux's fault, that's Adobe/Autodesk/Ubisoft's fault. I don't think there's a technical reason why they couldn't release AutoCAD for Linux, for example.

[โ€“] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

so, due to those gaps, it currently can't do those things.

This argument boils down to "yes it could, if someone bothered to implement it". Well... nobody has, so it can't

[โ€“] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think this is a misrepresentation. What more can Linux really do to get companies like this on board? It already has pretty much all anyone would need to support the platform: GUI toolkits, graphics drivers, etc. As far as I can see, Linux provides all the same functionality that other platforms do to support this, and considering that plenty of other companies support Linux just fine (Zoom, Steam, WPS office, etc.), in my opinion, it's unfair to point fingers and say Linux is bad because other actors pointedly ignore it.

[โ€“] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one is pointing a finger and saying Linux isn't capable, they're saying it currently cannot run certain programs which is true. Why it can't is irrelevant, to the user it just can't.

[โ€“] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

lots of stuff that "windows can do" is due to 3rd party software too.

[โ€“] 0_0j@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Thank you! Have my upvote