this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1185 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NAK@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Which economic system, in your opinion, would produce the highest quality products? And you can use whatever definition of quality you like

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Six Nations managed to keep their economic system functioning without a hiccup for at least 15,000 to 25,000 years. That one seems to work.

[–] NAK@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Let's switch to six nations.

That definitely answers my question

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's very clear you are not arguing in good faith.

[–] NAK@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When the response to my question of "what do you think is better" is an esoteric shout out to a culture that's been dead for thousands of years, that isn't even in the first page of Google results for "six nations" yeah. You're right. It's not a good faith argument

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not sure why you brought up quality of products in the first place.

[–] NAK@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because that's a thing capitalism is great at? If the connection between capitalism and ruthless efficiency and iteration isn't apparent to whoever is reading this then it's really not worth the conversation

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And? What is the relevance? It's "not worth the conversation" if you can't stay on topic, or connect your ideas together properly so as to be coherent to others.

[–] NAK@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You're right. I'm sorry