Open Source

31116 readers

285 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Cloak@lemmy.ml

kevincox@lemmy.ml

CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml

Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml

163

Thoughts on Post-Open Source? (www.theregister.com)

submitted 10 months ago by actual_patience@programming.dev to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

TLDR: Companies should be required to pay developers for any open source software they use.

He imagines a simple yearly compliance process that gets companies all the rights they need to use Post-Open software. And they'd fund developers who would be encouraged to write software that's usable by the common person, as opposed to technical experts.

It's an interesting concept, but I don't really see any feasible means to get this to kick off.

What are your thoughts on it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] actual_patience@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The fee could be really small but scale depending on factors like business size. Or there could be no fee outright for businesses smaller than a certain size.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That still sounds like a lot of confusion for small companies. especially given most FOSS is provided as-is without any legal consultant avaliable.

[–] jaeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

It's also against the very idea of software freedoms in the first place. This is just reinventing proprietary licenses.