this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
489 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
6021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, that possibility is why you're not on the hook for it. An ip address is not enough to prove what person did it.

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That article doesn't actually cite any legal precedent for someone being held liable, just a case in 2011 where the guy was found not guilty. It just says you could possibly be liable.

It would be like charging the ISP because someone did illegal stuff.