this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
386 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
3221 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 38 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Missing: any sort of physicist who will tell them both that the forward model says that the sun won't explode for a few billion years, and so far that model hasn't been wrong.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Minor correction: in a few billion years our sun will expand into its red giant death phase.

Also: our star can't go nova by our understanding of astrophysics. If it actually can, then we might need to throw out a lot of astrophysics, including predictions on when our star will expand.

Also also: the odds of the dice giving double 6s is MUCH higher than our sun going nova at any point in time even if it could go nova and was overdue.

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That last part is what the Bayesian scientist is wagering on, it's not missing, as op suggested

[–] Neato@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, gotcha. I tried learning Bayesian probability once and failed utterly. One of the only classes I just barely passed (stat was the other). My brain just barely computes it.

[–] triclops6@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The intuition is exactly your argument:

When the machine says yes it's either because

(1) the sun went nova (vanishingly small chance) and machine rolled truth (prob 35/36) -- the joint probability of this (the product) is near zero

OR

(2) sun didn't go nova (prob of basically one) and machine rolled lie (prob 1/36) -- joint prob near 1/36

Think of joint probability as the total likelihood. It is much more likely we are in scenario 2 because the total likelihood of that event (just under 1/36) is astronomically higher than the alternative (near zero)

I'm skipping stuff but hopefully my words make clear what they math doesn't always

[–] steveman_ha@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's a solid intro! Nice.

[–] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I think our sun can go nova. What it can't do is supernova based on the Chandrashekhar limit

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 10 points 10 months ago

That is not missing, it's the entire fucking point of the cartoon.

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't our sun too small to explode at all? IIRC the sun will expand enough to engulf the earth's orbit but will eventually shrink to a dwarf.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Too small to supernova and black hole, yes. But large enough to have a decent boom. Probably at least red giant, then a nova (explosion casting off outer layers) leaving a white dwarf remnant.

If I'm around by then, my model of medical science progress is wrong ;)

E: I'm wrong. That casting off of the outer gas envelope is not a nova. It's just a death throe of some sort.

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the update bro!

[–] DroneRights@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Missing: David Hume