this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
201 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
433 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
201
Substack says it will not remove or demonetize Nazi content (www.theverge.com)
submitted 10 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Quotes are not uneditable… but neither are comments.

You kinda get into an ouroborus of who has fewer edits, and honestly I don't know how to solve for that, but I do know that if you had substituted "n-word" for the slur it would look exactly the same if the OP edited the comment after the fact. Quoting the slur doesn't mitigate that.

“Zero tolerance” becomes a problem when the system requires you to quote, but then some months or years later decides to change the rules and applies them retroactively. I

Any policy becomes a problem at that point. It becomes less of a policy and more of a guideline