this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
81 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

59414 readers
4014 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Intel CEO claims 18A node will at least match TSMC's N2 performance and beat it to market::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm rooting for Intel in these efforts. Hopefully someone can pressure TSMC 's prices down and maybe even offer alternative fab sources for chips. Especially with the geopolitical situations with China.

I probably sound like a crazy person, but sometimes I worry about too much global reliance on TSMC and their plants usually being in Asia. Diversity should keep the market more affordable and at lower overall risk.

[–] aluminium@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You do realize that this is exactly what China wants. The less the U.S. needs Taiwan (because they can make their own high end chips) the less likley it is that the U.S. will help defend Taiwan.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We can't limit our supply chain for strategic resources to preserve an incentive to defend an ally. That's nutty.

Chips are the kind of thing where there just aren't enough of them being made. If we come up with a new way to produce more of them cheaply, that won't suddenly flood the market with cheap chips It will just marginally bring down the price of chips they compete with.

There's also a zero sum thing going on here, It's not just that we need chips We need to make sure the China doesn't get them and that strategic goal remains regardless of whether or not we start producing them elsewhere too.