this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
239 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
397 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pat@kbin.run 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If it's legal for women to be topless in public, why would pictures of topless females be in this law?

Our government really is dumb. Plus, it's only going to expose the kids to sketchier and possibly illegal stuff. If big porn players step up and do verifications, there would surely be dozens of sketchy sites popping up left and right to fill the void of providing porn.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If it's legal for women to be topless in public, why would pictures of topless females be in this law?

FWIW, I think the original Ontario law stated topless women can't behave in a sexual manner. I don't know if that has changed or been enforced.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

law stated topless women can't behave in a sexual manner

That law seems rather... open to interpretation.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

To be fair, the bill doesn't really say it's only for images of a sexual manner.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 10 months ago

But it distracts from our fucked up immigration and housing issues