this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
399 points (98.3% liked)

News

23301 readers
3847 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Switzerland does well with guns.

[–] Rokin@lemm.ee 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In Switzerland, everyone is trained to use guns

[–] capital@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

I don’t think lack of training was this guys issue.

[–] Borovicka@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Switzerland also has heavily regulated ammunition. You can't just go to the store and buy some bullets, like in Czechia

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Like Chris Rocks stand up. Charge more for the bullets and people will think more about killing. paraphrase

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Very true

Swiss:

27.6 guns per 100 residents

vs Czech:

12.5 per 100 residents

source

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Swiss solution really is what should be followed.

[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The solution to allow gun ownership is conscription?

No thanks.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you follow the constitution, the right to bear arms is for a well regulated militia. Not for a stressed 18 year old buying an AR-15 at Walmart to shoot up rioters from another state.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You might not like where that logic goes. The Supreme Court took a stance in United States v. Miller (1939) that the NFA's provisions on short barreled shotguns could be enforced on the basis that it's not a weapon that would be used by a well-regulated militia.

That brings us to a conclusion that literally nobody likes. The government could ban shorty shotguns and .22 rimfire, because those aren't militia weapons. It could not ban fully automatic weapons or even rocket launchers.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

We have to come up with something. I am a gun owner. There are legitimate uses for them. But a rifle marksman course requirement? Gun safety classes? 30 day waiting period? Mental health screening? Accountability if you buy it for someone else who uses it to commit violence? Anything?

Something has to stop the senseless violence.

I know that it won't stop it.

People in Brittain use knives.... Acid in the middle east.

The difference there is that the harm is limited to a few people and not these mass casualty events.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes totally forgot about that the people part...go read some federalist papers and a few history books the 2nd is for the people not the militia.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Hey don't cry about unborn babies but be pro school shootings there bud. The founders had single shot musket rifles not semi automatic rifles. If you want to be constructionist then ban the sale of anything other than breach loaders with separate shell and powder charge and have a good day.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

Isn't California doing something like that?

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

First off, I'm pro-choice. I'm just not an ignorant naive tool like you seem to be. The founders weren't idiots they knew tech wasn't going to stop, you could also own warships during those days, the equivalent of owning a nuclear attack sub basically. If you think the 2nd only applies to single shot muskets, then the Internet isn't covered by the first amendment in your mind. Being ignorant of history doesn't magically make you correct.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Look, there are ways to make this work. I'm not saying that we shouldn't have guns. I own one myself. However, maybe there should be a 30 day waiting period? Mental health fitness assessment? Anything?

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you're actually wanting to solve our violence problem, you go to the root of our societies issues, not the tool used. All of these things below would curb our violence as a whole 1000xs more than any new gun control can.

We can start with:

  • Single payer healthcare

  • Ending the War on Drugs

  • Ending Qualified immunity

  • Properly funding our schools and not just rich white suburb schools.

  • Build more schools and hire more teachers for proper pay so the class room sizes aren't 30-40 kids for one teacher.

  • UBI (at least start talking about it) once AI takes over most of the blue collar jobs.

  • End for profit prisons

  • Enforce the laws already on the books

  • Make sure there are safety nets for poor families so the kids don't turn to violence/gangs to survive.

  • Increase the minimum wage

  • Recreate our mental healthcare so kids don't turn to the internet for support. And to help veterans not end up as a suicide number.

  • Actively make a law to solidify Pro-choice rights. More unwanted children do not help our situation.

  • Banning Insider Trading for Congress

  • Term limits

  • Ranked Choice Voting so we can move away from a 2 party system

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If people learned how to defend themselves and then also everyone knew how to use them suddenly gun culture changes and it's like a tool instead of a status symbol. If you don't want to serve, there are non-combat roles. If you don't like it then hey maybe you should invent bullet proof kids.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wish they'd bring back the draft. Draft men and women over the age of 18 for like two years; it doesn't need to be for combat roles either. You get job training, you learn self-discipline, how to work in a team, really a lot of life skills. And then when your enlistment is up, you get training on how to find a job, how to write a resume, how to pass an interview, you get to use the GI bill and (in my hypothetical scenario) would keep Tricare. And more people would care about where and when we deploy our military, because they actually have a stake in it now.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The only way someone should be allowed to own a gun is after rigorous training, like in the military.

Only then do you have "good guy with a gun"

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks, funniest comment today

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 11 months ago

So the problem was this guy wasn't trained enough?

[–] breakfastburrito@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mandatory conscription is probably my most “out there” political belief. I think the benefits would be vast! I don’t think it would prevent mass shootings in America, though.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Conscription doesn't mean war. It means being prepared. And yes maybe we could be more prepared to deal with this stupidity and remove the gun culture if it wasn't special anymore.

[–] breakfastburrito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

I think one of the benefits would be less war since every citizen would be personally affected by it. Also all the public works and infrastructure. And healthcare. It could be great! Maybe it would help with all the “lonely men” culture that we hear so much about, and likely plays into some of the gun culture. I guess we’ll never know since that won’t happen here, though.