this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
781 points (95.8% liked)
People Twitter
5085 readers
871 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying.
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Is this the uncanny valley of dril tweets? I have no idea what this means
I also remember reading a tweet where someone said their young kid would whisper "like and subscribe" at bedtime like it was part of saying "goodbye".
It's bizarre.
My daughter, 8, wanted to send a birthday message to her grandma. We made the video, she sang happy birthday, and said "like and subscribe" at the end.
We did a second take without it.
My son is autistic and used to say "Like and Subscribe" to things he liked, and "Dislike and Unsubscribe" to things he didn't. He watched a lot of YouTube when he was little because his late father couldn't be arsed to actually parent while his mother was working.
Cutest thing though when he'd get a video he liked and the creator would tell you to give the video a thumbs up if you liked it he'd physically give the screen a thumbs up and say "I liked it. Good job." He later figured out how to leave comments and his first comment was a string of poop emoji. Never expected to have to give a 5 year old a talk about internet safety.
dumb kid not even telling them to comment as well
And not even a mention of the Patreon or the merch store.
I'll see YOU... in the morning! Buh-bye!
And super sus, NGL.
yeah that's what happens when you let the internet raise kids.
A little bit of everything, all of the time.
I guess we'll see how much worse that is than being raised by good ol' fashion network television.
It was kinda wholesome tho since the conversation went like
"I like and subscribe you too" as a meaning of affection
Kids are cute with their lingo
I’m inclined to believe it, because lots of videos have that as an ending.
Oof. And how about kids when some of their first words are “OK Googie” b/c the parents are always playing music on their smart speaker?
Thought it was clever marketing to disallow changing trigger phrases, but it’s actually child abuse! (OK not quite but it’s uncomfortable. I don’t even want a brand on my t-shirt, much less out of a relative’s mouth before they understand it.)
Oh I'm just old
Doesn't mean it makes sense. Isn't that still just second person plural? "Chat" being using as a collective noun.
This isn't some new-fangled youth speak breaking all the laws of language!!! It's literally just...english. Leave it to the media to blow something way the fuck out of proportion to create unnecessary conversation around their stupid ass article.
Two random tweeters
In this sense, "chat" is just a second person plural pronoun
Yeah it's substitutable for "y'all" in the sample usage.
Or if you use proper english, "you," which is both singular and plural. Many languages have a specific second person plural, such as the Spanish ustedes (or vosotros in Spain and speaking informally), so those could be directly substituted for "chat."
A fourth person, if it exists, would have to somehow refer to a "nothing" without giving it an entity, because that's the only gap between first, second, and third person pronouns.
Proper English would use thee/thou as singular and you as plural. Royal we, excepting. Or maybe royal we is the 4th person since you are speaking as yourself but more as a representing some other entity? I dunno this 4th person thing is confusing me …
There's no such thing as a "proper" form of a language
Hargrove hydrogen Greco.
That's just not true. There's a reason we all study grammar, and that's so we can all learn the rules that have been built up along the way. Without that, we'd get more severe language drift, which gets in the way of the primary reason we have language to begin with: to communicate. So the proper form is the form we've all essentially agreed to.
You are definitely not a linguist
You're right, just someone who is really into linguistics as a hobby. So I'm not coming from an academic background (e.g. study of how languages change), but rather a practical side (how languages work). I love studying grammar, especially from very different language families. So for me, grammar is incredibly important because it's how we keep communication consistent across diverse populations, and changing it regionally gets in the way of that.
But language is constantly changing, there literally is no "proper" version of any language, because any "proper" version is going to be biased toward the dialect spoken by whichever group created the "proper" version of that language.
Published grammatic standards, e.g. the MLA handbook, are for specific use cases and do not define the language itself
The "proper" version of a language is the one that's most common in current use, and that can absolutely be codified and taught. Consistent teaching of a set of rules keeps the language consistent and intelligible across regions.
And yes, there is no "owner" of English, but there are very influential bodies that establish the rules that are taught in schools. So in a sense, they do define the language because that's what's being taught in schools, and that's what keeps the language consistent.
Your perspective begs the question, if Standard American English is the "proper" language," how did it become the "proper" language when it didn't even exist 200 years ago? The answer is that language is constantly evolving, and by definition there is no "proper" form of any language. The way Americans speak today is different from 50 years ago, which was different from 100 years ago. The idea of a "proper" form of a language existing is usually imposed by a group seeking to subvert or exert control over other groups, outside of the specific use cases I mentioned before, like professional or academic language. Read this
Here's how I see it:
The English used today is very similar grammatically to the language used 200 years ago, so despite the Wild West days of the US, I think education has done a pretty good job of keeping the language stable. We obviously get new phrases and idioms as culture evolves, but grammar has remained pretty consistent
Here are the historical major events
Then look at English from the 1700s to today, over ~300 years, we've had very few changes in grammar. I guess thee and thou finally fell out of favor, but there's really not many changes, and that's about as long as the period between any of those major events.
"As codified" by who?
Grammar text books.
And who wrote those?
Professors.
And who/what gives them the authority to decide which is the "proper" dialect of a language?
It’s not even a pronoun, it’s still a noun.
Not really, because it's the indeterminate group watching you. If you say "you" or "you all", it's referring to the people interacting with you, not the audience. You have to break the fourth wall to initiate that interaction and make it second person
But streamers sometimes will sometimes, mid conversation with someone else, say "chat, can you get me the link to that?" And continue talking to the other person while waiting for it. They'll also say "chat is saying I should ask you about XYZ".
It's a specific relationship that straddles the line between a second person and third person. They're also usually not included in first person plural
So 'guys' or 'people' or 'audience'?
Thanks, my near 60yo brain was having a moment till your comment came along
Ah geez this is sad
I see it on TikTok a lot, in the comments on a video that seems implausible. It's sometimes someone genuinely asking the other commenters if the (whatever it was) is true. Other times people just use it to express astonishment.
Think of it as a replacement for "For real??"