this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1135 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
4196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1135
41% of fediverse instances have blocked threads so far!!! (tech.lgbt)
submitted 10 months ago by vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world
575 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure what Meta's goal is with adding federation to Threads. Some options include:

  • Preempting government scrutiny for monopolistic practices
  • Gaining a competitive advantage against Xitter/Bluesky/etc...
  • Giving Threads users access to more people/content

As for why I think the flow of users is likely to be away from Threads:

  • People who already actively use Mastodon and the like tend to be fairly technically sophisticated and anti-corporate. Not many of those will switch to a Meta product when they can reach the same audience without it.
  • Most people who joined Threads got there via Instagram. Those sorts of mainstream users mostly haven't been exposed to decentralized, non-corporate social media. The added exposure of seeing it from Threads is more marketing than these open source projects could ever hope to buy.