Technology

58133 readers

4751 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

161

What DID Apple innovate? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

339 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Genuine question.

I know they were the scrappy startup doing different cool things. But, what are the most major innovative things that they introduced, improved or just implemented that either revolutionized, improved or spurred change?

I am aware of the possibility of both fanboys and haters just duking it out below. But there's always that one guy who has a fkn well-formatted paragraph of gold. I await that guy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Other systems did have double-click, and app bundles (which I still think are just fantastic) were a NeXT thing. (which of course became Apple, but they weren't at the time). But yeah, Apple way refined and brought those to a mass market.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

app bundles (which I still think are just fantastic) were a NeXT thing.

App bundles were just a better implementation of resource forks, which were invented by Apple and pre-dated NeXT.

(which of course became Apple, but they weren’t at the time)

NeXT was founded by people who worked at Apple (not just Steve) and they were largely put in charge when they came back to Apple. I wouldn't call them separate companies. Just a weird moment in the history of the company. A lot like what just happened at OpenAI.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

App bundles have virtually no relationship with resource forks. I guess you could say that App Bundles COULD include SOME metadata that you could have included in Forks, including the idea that something was an application or not. But that's about it.

On the NeXT always being Apple thing - I mean, some of it maybe was spiritually Apple, and eventually it was 100% Apple. But we're splitting hairs.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Eh, the difference between app bundles and resource forks isn't the functionality itself, but rather how the filesystem interface cuts through the functionality.

An OSX bundle is a Unix directory, whereas a classic Mac application is a file in a filesystem that supports multiple forks within a single file. Either way, you have typed objects (files or resources) that get carried around with a master object (the application).

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

The first Mac came out in 1984; NeXT didn't have a product until 1988.

NeXT was later bought by Apple and their tech became the foundation of Mac OS X in 2001.

But I was referring to the original '80s Macintosh System, not OS X. :)