this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
308 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
3106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
308
Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators (theconversation.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Data poisoning: how artists are sabotaging AI to take revenge on image generators::As AI developers indiscriminately suck up online content to train their models, artists are seeking ways to fight back.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

illegally obtained [...] work

It what jurisdiction is it illegal?

And is "obtained" even the right word?...

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There’s currently multiple lawsuits in the courts to decide just that.

If they’re scraping the internet to add to a database of training data, I’d consider that obtaining and storing the work.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Except they're not storing the work. They store information about the work.