this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
69 points (96.0% liked)
Bicycles
3103 readers
14 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The helmet part is such a misrepresentation of the data. The reason there's not any significant injury reduction is because there is an opposite effect of people driving less safely when they are wearing a helmet out of a false sense of security, therefore causing more injury. The real solution here is to educate people about the importance of helmets and about the importance of other safety measures such as safe cycling practices.
So the real solution to cyclists getting run over is teaching cyclists about safety?
I'm not against teaching the importance of helmet and cycling safely - I think those are relevant ingredients - but this is FAR far away from a real solution.
Okay, yeah, I was thinking only from the cyclists' perspective. Definitely the most important part is to teach drivers to drive safely with cyclists.
I believe that this could be the case, but do you have any evidence or studies to back it up?