this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
571 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59647 readers
3100 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 98 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Wow the value of a life I guess. I don’t really know what can come close to the value of a life, but this doesn’t seem like it.

[–] burliman@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What would be the value of life then? I’ll save you the answer: no matter how big the number you say, someone else will say bigger. Until it becomes priceless, which is the answer.

However death and accidental death isn’t always avoidable. And when we pin the fault on someone we cannot expect to say “priceless” is what they owe the victim’s family. So we assign an amount of money or time that hurts, and call it good.

Doesn’t mean life is worth that. And saying so doesn’t help anyone.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Sure but even looking a only the financial produce of one person for a family dwarfs the comical 23k here. And that’s not even looking at the emotional side of things. 23k is straight insulting imho.

[–] mindlessscrollingparrot@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

Two people were killed, so you're really talking 11.5k.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

That's life insurances job, this would be on top of life insurance, and is more about where the money comes than where it is going.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The U.S. uses the value of statistical life VSL. Here are the numbers from the Department of Transportation over the last 10 years or so.

So, it is interesting and egregious that the driver needs only pay $23K and Tesla pays nothing at all!

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So according to this, the DoT values a life at $12.5M in 2022? I’m curious about their methodology.

[–] onion@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You look at different jobs, how high the risk of dying is and how much they pay, and work out from that how much more pay people demand for say a 1% risk increase. Then you scale that up to 100% risk.

So if you were to work an average job no one has ever survived, and you died on the day you retire, you would've earned those 12mil

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Huh that’s kinda neat. Thanks!

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

True. But what if Tesla has to pay a billion for producing software that runs people over? They probably would not have beta software on the road.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

That was the penalty for the felony charge for the driver of the car that ran off the highway into a surface street. It's almost certain that drivers insurance also paid out their maximum.

In addition, Tesla is recalling all those cars to change the system that pretends to ensure a driver using autopilot is actually paying attention.

And a civil suit will likely follow from the 2 victims families.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] dylanmorgan 4 points 11 months ago

That is just the fine, the families are suing the driver and Tesla. Here’s hoping the Tesla suit gives them the real prize: the death of a company.

(I know it won’t happen but a guy can dream.)