this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
766 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

10348 readers
1759 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] might_steal_your_cat@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

What about 3D Venn diagrams, but the sets are spheres?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Venn diagrams, but the sets represent whatever the diagram is about (like houses for housing markets).

[–] jadero@mander.xyz 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think for maximum uselessness, they should not be overlapping spheres, but deform at the interface, like soap bubbles or rubber balls. As long as the spheres are the same size and modelled with the same "surface tension" or "elasticity", the "intersection" of two sets would then be a circular interface with an area proportional to what would otherwise be an overlap (I think). If the spheres have different sizes or are modelled with different surface tension or elasticity, one would "intrude" into the other.

Multiple sets would have increasingly complex shapes that may or not also create volumes external to the deformed spheres but still surrounded by the various interfaces.

Time to break out the mathematics of bubbles and foam. This data ain't gonna obscure itself!

Might there actually be utility to something like this? Scrunch the spheres together but make invisible everything that is not an interface and label the faces accordingly. I suppose the same could be said of the shape described by overlapping. (Jesus, you'd think I was high or something. Just riffing.)

[–] abir_vandergriff@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Projected on a 2D screen, it'd look more like a normal venn diagram.

[–] jadero@mander.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

That's what 3D printing is for...

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@iusearchlinux.fyi 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One might even go as far as 5D

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

When I read your comment, my monocle popped right off!

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Volumetric Herbert space diagram.

Why limit it to 3 dimensions?

[–] hansl@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why limit it to an integer number of dimensions?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because I'm not sure how to make it work in non integer dimensions.