Honoring past decisions and commitments Is not the sunk cost fallacy, though. The sunk cost fallacy is purely "throwing good money after bad". The best expression is one quoted by economist Emily Oster: "If you don't like your beer, stop drinking it."

Going to the gym is a terrible example, because by not not going to the gym, it's not the past you're taking away from... it's the future.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The best expression is one quoted by economist Emily Oster: “If you don’t like your beer, stop drinking it.”

But if you're trying to develop an affinity for IPAs for some stupid reason, then shouldn't you keep drinking it?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

Sure, that's future-oriented. It's stupid, but not fallacious.

But if you're just drinking it because you paid $8 and you don't want to "waste it", THAT is sunk cost fallacy.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Id say the gym isnt a bad example. If I've been regularly and sunk that time and cost into improving my fitness, not going and sitting on the lounge eating pizza doesnt just take away from the future it also invalidates the efforts in the past (annoyingly frigging quickly too) making the "sunk cost" a loss that I might not want to lose and give me motivation.