this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
168 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
235 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
168
Chat GPT Did NOT Like My Memory Test (beehaw.org)
submitted 9 months ago by millie@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was trying to do a memory test to see how far back 3.5 could recall information from previous prompts, but it really doesn't seem to like making pseudorandom seeds. 😆

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] millie@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I haven't had much luck with it writing stuff from scratch, but it does a great job of helping with debugging and figuring out why complex equations are doing what they're doing.

I put together a pretty complex shader recently, and gpt 3.5 did a great job of helping me figure out why it wasn't doing quite what I wanted.

I wouldn't trust it to code anything without my input, but it's great for advice and explanations and certain kinds of problem solving. Just don't assume it has the right answer, you still have to do the work

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

I've tried it with languages I don't know, and it managed to write simple working functions by just iterating over:

  1. Ask it to write the code
  2. Try to run the code, write down any errors
  3. Look up the errors, and ask it to fix them in the code
  4. Repeat from 2 until there are no more errors

It seems to lose context easily, like if you ask it to fix one error, then another, it might revert the first fix, but asking it to fix both at once, tends to work.

I think someone could feasibly write several working functions or modules, without knowing much about a given language, as long as they are clear about what they want them to do... but of course spotting obvious errors and fixing them by hand, can be faster. Fixing integration problems is where I think it might get harder (haven't tried though, could be interesting).