Asklemmy

43893 readers

1034 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

should anything be copyrightable? (beehaw.org)

submitted 11 months ago by Recluse_Spider@beehaw.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You've all had some very interesting answers for my last post so here is a question for you, how do you think about copyright in general and should it exist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 11 months ago

I get what you're saying, but today a minority inherits billions, many/most inherit when they're over fifty years old.

I mean if you have kids, of course they should have it all to help them out (with some upper limit in the hundreds of thousands IMO but that's discussable ofc) but do tell me why the vast majority of old-timers should be the ones benefit from inheritance?