Asklemmy

43893 readers

1034 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

should anything be copyrightable? (beehaw.org)

submitted 11 months ago by Recluse_Spider@beehaw.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You've all had some very interesting answers for my last post so here is a question for you, how do you think about copyright in general and should it exist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to see government subsidies instead.

How would that really work in practice though? Would Disney get $100 million for making a movie while I only get $100 for making my own independent movie? It'd be really hard to assign a value to things without the associated system that we currently use.

[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 11 months ago

It's a good point another user also made. I'm thinking private patents that the government regularly purchases is probably more achievable. Otherwise, yeah, you'd have to employ people to estimate the value of an IP from rates of consumption, and it would be complicated